RADEON HD 2600 XT VS INTEL HD 380M WINDOWS

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s. #61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s. #57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s. #56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s. #51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s. #44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s. #43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s. #42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s. #38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s. #35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.041s. #34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s. #33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s. #32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s. #27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s.

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s. #22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s. #21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s. #19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.012s. #11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s. #8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s. #7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.009s. #6 getting avg benchmarks for device 86 +0.016s. #2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 10:53:38 +0100 +0.001s. #0 no ids found in url (should be separated by '_') +0s. ManufacturerДЄvivo HD Video, PowerPlay 7.0, Programmable Tesselation Unit (meant for Direct X 10.1) Crysis and World in Conflict are only in low details fluently playable. In games the HD 2600 positions itselft between GeForce 8600M GS and GT. To be mentioned is also the 256 bit wide ringbus. Therefore DirectX 10.0 and Shader Model 4.0 are supported. Technically, the chip owns 120 stream processors which are able to manage vertex-, geometric or pixelshader operations.

RADEON HD 2600 XT VS INTEL HD 380M WINDOWS

Furthermore, ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 is certified for Windows Vista (for the Aero user interface). Furthermore PowerPlay 7.0 brings longer battery runtimes. This would mean that the card is able to represent all modern games in medium resolutions and without Antialiasing without motion interruptions.Дue to the Avivo HD videoengine the Chip accelerates HD Video like HD DVD, Blu-ray (Video Decoder for H.264/AVC, VC-1, MPEG-1, MPEG-2, MPEG-4/DivXВ Video Codecs). You can see four empty spots for BGA memory, which would allow building an 1 GB version which is coming soon.This is a DirectX 10 graphic card from ATI and direct competitor to the NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS graphic card for laptops. 'Nothing important on the back of the card. Should this read 512MB? Isn't this car a 256MB model. Something positive too, do like the cooler and power consumption, but missing extra powerplug kinda gives that away and also the performance Seems to be missing some stuff still, wonder if it's for the 512MB version or something faster (like HD2900gto). Oh and voltage reculators (and those smaller ones) Yeah you don't get DX10, but you get a lot faster GPU with the same price. SAPPHIRE 100186L Radeon X1950XT 256MB GDDR3 PCI Express x16 VIVO HDCP This is 149$ and x1950xt (no x1900xt available anymore) goes for: (and no, anyone should not play without those, if you buy a new GPU ) I'd bet that 128-bit memory bus width is to blame on the AA/AF performance, atleast my previous card (x800gto) and this don't have that problem, both with 256bit. 3dmark06 score looks quite perty, closes in near my card, but that is without antialiaising and anistropic of course. Wonder what happens to performance when you enable AA&AF in SM3.0 or better yet SM4.0. Near useless card, can't use AA&AF, goes slower than a x1800gto and this is with SM2.0.

Radeon hd 2600 xt vs intel hd 380m